<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Book Of The Generations Of Adam</title>
	<atom:link href="http://answersfromthebook.org/2009/09/29/the-book-of-the-generations-of-adam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://answersfromthebook.org/2009/09/29/the-book-of-the-generations-of-adam/</link>
	<description>Finding Answers In God&#039;s Word</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 16:25:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loren</title>
		<link>http://answersfromthebook.org/2009/09/29/the-book-of-the-generations-of-adam/#comment-121</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Loren]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 20:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://answersfromthebook.org/?p=236#comment-121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems that we have come full circle and have arrived back at the beginning. I believe that you are more interested in having a debate over issues of semantics rather than discussing the Word of God. With all due respect, I am in no way interested in arguing over whether or not we should label death as having a &quot;purpose&quot; or not. 

I maintain what I said before that it is a judgment and consequence for man&#039;s disobedience of God. The only &quot;purposes&quot; of death are entirely due to man&#039;s rebellion against God&#039;s sovereignty (I would not choose to use the expression that death was &quot;imposed&quot; on man; disobedience was man&#039;s choice, not God&#039;s) and death was never in God&#039;s plan for His Creation. 

I must candidly admit that the point which you are attempting to make is being entirely lost on me; I truly have no idea what you are driving at. Suffice it to say that it is apparent that you are in fact seeking to engage in a dispute and I have no interest whatsoever in doing so.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems that we have come full circle and have arrived back at the beginning. I believe that you are more interested in having a debate over issues of semantics rather than discussing the Word of God. With all due respect, I am in no way interested in arguing over whether or not we should label death as having a &#8220;purpose&#8221; or not. </p>
<p>I maintain what I said before that it is a judgment and consequence for man&#8217;s disobedience of God. The only &#8220;purposes&#8221; of death are entirely due to man&#8217;s rebellion against God&#8217;s sovereignty (I would not choose to use the expression that death was &#8220;imposed&#8221; on man; disobedience was man&#8217;s choice, not God&#8217;s) and death was never in God&#8217;s plan for His Creation. </p>
<p>I must candidly admit that the point which you are attempting to make is being entirely lost on me; I truly have no idea what you are driving at. Suffice it to say that it is apparent that you are in fact seeking to engage in a dispute and I have no interest whatsoever in doing so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

